RIFLEMAN IN ASSAM RIFLES 2012 RESULT

RECTT FOR THE POST OF CONSTABLE(GD) IN CAPFS AND RIFLEMAN IN ASSAM RIFLES 2012 - RESULT

LIST OF MALE CANDIDATES RECOMMENDED FOR APPOINTMENT IN ROLL NO ORDER  


Declaration of final result of Male candidates for recruitment of Constables (GD) in CAPFs 
and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles, 2012.
The Staff Selection Commission conducted recruitment of Constable (GD) in CAPFs and 
Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles Examination, 2012 on 22.4.2012 of those candidates who have 
qualified the PST/PET. 
2. The results of written examination of 1,58,773 and 2461 male candidates qualified for 
Detailed Medical Examination were declared on 12-6-2012 and 22.6.2012.
3. On the basis of the written examination and Detailed Medical Examination, Commission 
has now declared the result of 37,553 male candidates including 37,346 in Select List and 207 in Reserve List who have been recommended for appointment to the post of Constable (GD) in 
CAPFs and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles.
4. The minimum cut-off percentage marks in the written examination are 33% for SC, ST 
and OBC candidates and 35% for UR and Ex-Servicemen candidates. Domicile in a State/UT is an eligibility condition laid down for consideration against vacancies in the State/UT. Keeping these factors in view Commission fixed different qualifying criteria for different States/UTs for calling the candidates for Detailed Medical Examination.
5. The final result has been processed in the following manner finalized in consultation with 
MHA and as per MHA guidelines:-
(i) Select list has been prepared as per state-wise vacancies with further reservation for 
candidates of Border Districts/ Naxal or Militancy affected districts within the state. Candidates 
belonging to Border/Naxal or Militancy affected districts have been considered against vacancies in such areas or in the State concerned as may be advantageous to them. Allocation to various CAPFs has been done as per merit cum option of the candidates, subject to availability of vacancies in State/UT concerned, reservation for Border district and Naxal/Militancy affected districts and category-wise reservation. 

(ii) MHA has advised that unfilled vacancies in Jammu & Kashmir, North Eastern States 
(Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura), Naxal and 
Militancy affected states (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya 
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal) should not be filled with candidates from 
surplus States/UTs. Unfilled vacancies pertaining to Border districts are also not to be filled from 
surplus candidates of the same/other states. Therefore, such vacancies were not taken into 
consideration after preparation of the Select List while allotting surplus candidates against 
vacancies in deficit States/UTs. Surplus candidates securing marks above the maximum cut off 
marks fixed in the written examination for their respective categories for RL (list IV of 
candidates qualified for Medical Examination) were considered for allocation against the unfilled 
vacancies other than in the States mentioned above, for inclusion in the Reserve List. 


(iii) In order to ensure that candidates selected in the reserve list are not allocated to a better 
preference as compared to the candidates with higher merit order in the select list, such 
candidates getting better preference while being considered against vacancies meant for other 
States were included in the reserve list. 
(iv) Some candidates did not get allocated in the select list due to blank / invalid options. These 
candidates were also considered for allocation in the reserve list after substituting their 
preference as ABCDEF i.e. orders of preference in the Notice.
6. Keeping in view the detail of state wise, Vacancy type wise (G-General /      B- Border 
Districts / N-Naxal_Militancy affected districts), Category wise number of Vacancies, number 
of filled vacancies, Highest and Lowest marks secured by candidates selected against the 
corresponding vacancies. The rows pertaining to 0 reported vacancies have not been included in 
the tables:-
(Category : 1- SC, 2- ST, 3 – ExS, 6- OBC, 9- UR)
Click here to view Result

8.     Tie-criteria used for preparing result is:-
(a) The tie is resolved by the Commission by referring to the total marks in the written 
examination i.e. a candidate having more marks in the written examination gets preference over the candidate(s) with less marks.
(b) If the tie still persists then the marks in Part A are referred to i.e. a candidate having more 
marks in Part A is given preference.
(c) If the tie still persists, the candidate older in age gets preference. 
(d) If the tie still persists, it is finally resolved by referring to the alphabetical order of names i.e. 
a candidate whose name begins with the alphabet which comes first in the alphabetical order gets preference.
9. There are total 482 candidates who are kept provisional by RDs in the verified data but are 
included in Select List (481)/Reserve List(1).  Concerned RDs/DDs will be required to check the eligibility of such candidates thoroughly before their nomination
10. The List of recommended candidates is purely provisional and subject to  the candidates 
fulfilling all the eligibility conditions prescribed in the Notice of the said examination and also 
subject to, among other things thorough verification of their identity with reference to this 
photographs, signatures, handwritings, etc. on the application forms, admission certificates, etc. 
11. For candidates belonging to reserved categories for whom certain percentage of 
vacancies are reserved as per policy of the Government, the category status is indicated against their roll numbers.  It is important to note that some of these candidates have been declared qualified only in the category mentioned against their roll numbers.  If any candidate does not actually belong to the category mentioned against his name, he may not be eligible to be included in the list.  It is, therefore, in the interest of candidates concerned to contact 
immediately the respective Regional Offices of the Commission in all such cases where they do not belong to the categories against their Roll numbers.
12. Candidates in Reserve List will be en-bloc junior to candidates in Select List.
13. The Lists are provisional subject to verification of their eligibility and verification of 
State of Domicile and their claim to be Domicile in Border Districts/Naxal and militancy 
affected districts of candidates in Select List, who have been allotted concerned vacancies.
14.   The detailed result of this examination of the candidates recommended is available on 
the Commission’s Website:  http://ssc.nic.in. Candidates marks data including their Medical 
result, post preference etc. will be placed on SSC website shortly.
15. The result are placed on the Website without prejudice to the Commission undertaking 
post examination analysis of performance of the candidates in the written examination and taking further action, as provided in the notice of the examination in respect of candidates who are found on the basis of such analysis, to have  indulged in malpractice in the written examination.
16. Any candidate desirous of making representation against the result due to change in 
category, change in State border or Naxal/Militancy affected district code etc. may represent on 
or before 31.10.2012 to the undersigned giving full facts and furnishing documentary evidence. 
Representations received after this date may not be entertained. It may also be noted that claims not made in the application, will not be entertained at all.

For more details click here or visit http://ssc.nic.in


Comments